﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Intellectual Property Matters: Recent Comments</title><link>http://ipmatters.iplawblog.net</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:40:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Federal Circuit: Capability of performing in infringing manner is not necessarily direct infringement.</title><link>http://ipmatters.iplawblog.net/2009/02/10/federal-circuit-capability-of-performing-in-infringing-manner-is-not-necessarily-direct-infringement.aspx#comment-1853823</link><dc:creator>James Myers</dc:creator><description>I'm looking for cases, treatises, etc., which apply similar reasoning to method patent claims--capability to perform a method is not direct infringement.  Any help would be appreciated.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ipmatters.iplawblog.net/2009/02/10/federal-circuit-capability-of-performing-in-infringing-manner-is-not-necessarily-direct-infringement.aspx#comment-1853823</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>